Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1934No. 8 Div. 530PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The error assigned was the granting of ^plaintiff's motion for a new trial on the evidence — the verdict and judgment having been ■rendered for the defendant.

The brief of appellant contains this, statement: “When there is evidence on both sides, or some evidence to support the verdict, .it should not be set aside, because it may, mot correspond with the opinion of the court, as to the weight of the testimony, or because it is against the mere preponderance of the evidence. Cobb v. Malone & Collins, 92 Ala. 630-635, 9 So. 738.” Such is the rule when'a motion for a new trial is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Parker v. Hayes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Morris v. YanceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Lowe v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Williams v. Birmingham Water Works Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Birmingham Electric Co. v. TonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API