Burnett v. State

Eldridge, Judge.

Appellant Reginald Burnett challenges his conviction for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. We affirm.

1. In his first enumeration, Burnett contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. However, on appeal, the *593appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Grant v. State, 195 Ga. App. 463, 464 (393 SE2d 737) (1990). When reviewing the sufficiency of evidence on…