Legal Opinion

Wohlert v. Wohlert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1927No. 1 Div. 469PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant is the wife of appellee, and filed this bill against him seeking divorce from bed and board, custody of their two small children, and temporary and permanent alimony, including reasonable solicitor’s fees for the' prosecution of the suit. Fersonal service was had upon defendant, who did not appear, and against whom decree pro confesso was duly entered. Testimony was heard orally in open court and the cause submitted for final decree, resulting in a dismissal of the bill, from which decree complainant prosecutes this appeal.

The evidence failed to make out a case justifying a decree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spafford v. SpaffordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Rosenau v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Rearden v. ReardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Rice v. Eiseman Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Cook v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Ex Parte HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Cagle v. CagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. McDowell v. McDowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API