Legal Opinion

Crest Const. v. Shelby Cty. Bd. of Educ.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 23, 1992No. 1910973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This case involves an interpretation of the Competitive Bid Law, specifically Ala. Code 1975, § 41-16-50 et seq. The basic question presented is whether a county board of education, having required a bidder on a school construction project to be prequalified, could award the contract to a contractor who submitted a higher bid, on the basis that the higher bidder was "the lowest responsible bidder." § 41-16-50(a) (emphasis added). In short, did the school board,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Dairyland Ins. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Inge v. Board of Public Works of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. General Elec. Credit Corp. v. Strickland Div. of Rebel Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Smiths Water Auth. v. City of Phenix CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Beavers v. County of WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Spring Hill Lighting & Supply Co. v. Square D Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Alabama Dept. of Transp. v. LAND ENERGYSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Ex Parte MoebesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API