Legal Opinion

Kostrob v. Riley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 20, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MnsmiEN, J.

The motion in this ease is to set aside a summons issued by the above-named plaintiffs, on the ground that the same is defective in that it requires the defendants “to answer the complaint of Mary Kostrob, an infant, by Joseph Kostrob, and Joseph Kostrob individually, in an action at law in the Hudson County Common Pleas Court,” and also requires the said defendants “to file their answers with the clerk of the Hudson County Common-Pleas Court at Jersey City,” and is tested by William S. Gummere, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, at Trenton.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. Hotel Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Limpert Bros. v. StittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  3. Gaskill v. FoulksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API