Legal Opinion

Huff v. Clark

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1904No. 4,986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Monroe Circuit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Action by James B. Clark against Thomas Huff and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants Huff and another appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

James B. Clark, as plaintiff below, prosecuted an action against James T. Bright, as defendant, upon a note, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage. Appellants, Thomas Huff, Squire Thomas, and Hayes Hunter Were made parties. The complaint is in the usual form upon a note, and for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The only charge in the complaint against Thomas and Huff and Hunter is in the following language: “That the defendants, Squire Thomas, Thomas Huff, and Hayes Hunter, are made parties to show what, if any, interest they have in said property.” Hunter was defaulted, but neither he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Bowen v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Bradford v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Havens v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Olyphant v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golly v. KinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API