Legal Opinion
Ariel Gilligan, et al. v. Experian Data Corporation, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 6, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02873Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARIEL GILLIGAN, et al., Case No. 25-cv-02873-RFL Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. STAY AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION EXPERIAN DATA CORPORATION, et TO DISMISS al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 44 Defendants. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of a putative class, alleging that Experian Data Corporation, Experian PLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and Tapad, Inc. (together “Experian”), use Tapad pixels to “track[] in real time and record[] indefinitely the personal information and specific web activity” of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Graves v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Nora Phillips v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Congdon v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016