Legal Opinion

United States v. Erpenbeck

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2008No. 06-4247, 06-4248, 06-4386, 06-4389Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

532 F.3d 423 (2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

A. William ERPENBECK, Jr., Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 06-4247, 06-4248, 06-4386, 06-4389.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: April 23, 2008.

Decided and Filed: July 2, 2008.

ARGUED: Eric W. Richardson, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Benjamin C. Glassman, Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Eric W. Richardson, Glenn V. Whitaker, Michael J. Bronson, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Gilman; Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API