United States v. Salter
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
Respondent moves for reconsideration of our ex parte order allowing an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from a discovery order of the district court in an Internal Revenue subpoena matter. His principal contention is that there is not a “controlling question of law,” as statutorily required. We have assumed, without deciding, in similar circumstances that there would be such a question. Goldfine v. Pastore, 1 Cir., 1958, 261 F.2d 519, 521. On further consideration we believe there is not. Pre-trial disclosure may indeed involve an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Ray B. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Lear Siegler, Inc., a Corporation v. John S. AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- David Lash, Treasurer, David's, Inc. v. Laurence A. Nighosian, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Bear Marine Services, and International Matex Tank Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Castle v. SHERBURNE CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Resnick v. American Dental Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Harrisonville Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Adams v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.