Legal Opinion
Dawson v. Overmyer
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1895No. 17,436PublishedCited by 7 opinions
From the Fulton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
It is ássigned for error that the circuit court overruled a demurrer for want of sufficient facts, to the complaint, and that it erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The appellee had a decree authorizing him to redeem. The pertinent allegations of the complaint are as follows:
That appellee “shows to the court that he is the administrator of Elizabeth Rarrick, * * deceased, * * *- who, at her death, was the owner of certain promissory notes secured by mortgage on lands in Fulton county, Indiana (describing them); that on and before October 6, 1890, part of said sum had become…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buser v. ShepardIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Kemp v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Calahan v. DunkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Brown v. FolletteIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Geller v. MeekIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bowen v. GerholdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. v. Oconto City Water Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.