Legal Opinion

Ybarra v. Sylvany

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1893No. 19,102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; Lucien Shaw, Judge. Action by Candelario Ybarra against Stephen Sylvany to quiet the title to a certain parcel of land. From a judgment for plaintiff and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

This is an action to quiet the plaintiff’s title to a parcel of land in the city of Los Angeles, and the complaint is in the usual form. The defendant, by his answer, denied all the averments of the complaint; denied that he had no right, title, or interest in or to the land; and alleged that he was the owner thereof in fee simple, and was such owner and entitled to the possession of the land when the action was commenced; alleged that he had been in the quiet and peaceable possession of the premises described, holding and claiming the same adversely to the plaintiff and all other…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Daly v. SoroccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Oakland Gas Light Co. v. DameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oregon Home Builders v. Montgomery Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Molina v. RamirezArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Warren County Bank v. KeisterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API