Recreatives, Inc. v. Travel-On Motorcycles Co.

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant appellant, contending that the trial court erred in excluding its tendered parol evidence, essentially argues that the contract was a consignment sale agreement under a “sale or return” arrangement and further maintains that the proposed “ . . . oral testimony sought to be introduced was not for the purpose of contradicting the paper writing but rather for the purpose of showing that the paper writing was Not the Contract between the parties.” We find no merit to defendant’s contention.

Pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code, as adopted in North Carolina, parol…