Legal Opinion

Skipper v. Handley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 19, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The orders herein appealed from were reversed, Skipper v. Handley, 121 So. R. 792, but a rehearing was granted. Upon further consideration the Court has determined that notwithstanding the contention as to the effect of the supplemental agreement referred to in the former opinion, the facts alleged in this case bring it within the rules announced in Chubb v. Chadwick, 93 Fla. 114, 111 So. R. 538; Wilson v. Daniel, 94 Fla. 1140, 115 So. R. 527, and not within the rules stated in Taylor v. Rawlins, 86 Fla. 279, 97 So. R. 714; 35 A. L. R. 271; 90 Fla. 621, 106 So. R. 424. It is therefore…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. Taylor v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Chubb v. J. Harker Chadwick & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Wilson v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keys Lobster v. Ocean DiversDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Barnett v. DollisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API