Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morganfield National Bank v. Damien Elder & Sons

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1992No. 91-SC-516-DGPublished

1DissentSpain, Justice

Respectfully, I dissent and would reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm the judgment entered by the trial court in favor of the bank. In so deciding, I, like the learned circuit judge, am fully aware that a creditor cannot ordinarily apply partnership funds to pay the individual debts of any partner without the consent of the *897remaining partners. Perry Bank & Trust Company v. Napier, 240 Ky. 469, 42 S.W.2d 694 (1931). Under the facts in the case at hand, however, the trial judge found that all the partners expressly or by implication consented to setoffs by the bank from the partnership…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. Hagan v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Marcum v. Wilhoit, Banking and Securities Com'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Perry Bank Trust Company v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API