Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Fuhr v. Carrier

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1989No. 15737Published

1DissentMaus, Judge

I dissent. Section 195.145.1 in relevant part provides “any peace officer of the state, upon making or attempting to make an arrest for a violation of this law, shall seize any such vehicle....” However, I do not believe the section must be read literally to require that the identical peace officer who arrests a suspect must personally seize a vehicle used in violation of § 195.025.

Applicable principles to be observed in construing this statute have received the following expression. “To this purpose, the court considers a particular statute together with related statutes which may shed light…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. United States v. William Bruce HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Peach v. BloomSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API