Legal Opinion

Ullmann v. Mayer

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

Defendant seeks a stay of the action until six months after the termination of the war. The defendant is a resident of Prance and when last heard from was in the unoccu*601pied portion of that country. It is conceded that communication with him is not possible and has not been since November, 1942. It is well established that where a defendant is in a foreign country cut off from communication with the United States by the exigencies of war, he is entitled to a stay of proceedings until he has had an opportunity to confer with counsel and to take such other steps in his defense as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. The Kaiser Wilhelm IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  3. Murray Oil Products Co. v. Mitsui & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geismar v. BellamyNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Schott v. Schott's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API