Ranger County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Guin
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentGonzalez, Justice
I dissent. The court has misapplied the Stowers Doctrine in several respects. First, the court has erroneously expanded the doctrine to include all aspects of agency law. Second, an unconditional offer to settle is a necessary prerequisite to an insurer’s liability in a Stowers suit. The offer to settle in this case was conditional, thereby relieving Ranger from liability under Stowers,1
I. The Stowers Doctrine.
The court holds that an insurer can be liable under Stowers for negligence other than negligence in failing to settle a claim within the policy limits. This is an incorrect statement of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Hernandez v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984
- Henke v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Highway Ins. Underwriters v. Lufkin-Beaumont Motor Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.