Application of McIlhenny Company
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1ConcurrenceRich, Judge
While I agree in general with Judge MARTIN’S opinion, I wish to mention certain salient features of this case which influence my decision not referred to therein.
The goods named in the application is “Pepper Sauce.” Pepper sauce is a liquid and of necessity is sold in a container. The record shows the marketed form of the goods to be glass bottles of pepper sauce containing 2 fluid ounces. Thus, what is marketed is not just pepper sauce but, more accurately, 2-ounce bottles of pepper sauce. Accepting the allegation of the application as true, the applicant has used the same cap and bottle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Application of Swift & CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of Hillerich & Bradsby CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of E. J. Brach & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Jantzen Knitting Mills v. West Coast Knitting MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re Pierce Arrow Motor Car Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.