Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 8, 1907No. 590PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari, from Liberty superior court — Judge Seabrook. May 22, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

In order for this court to review a refusal to sanction an application for certiorari, the petition must be incorporated in the bill of exceptions or otherwise verified as a part thereof by the trial judge; an unsanetioned petition can not be specified as a part of the record. Lenney v. Finley, 118 Ga. 719, 45 S. E. 593; Wood v. Tattnall, 115 Ga. 1000, 42 S. E. 403; Tompkins v. Newnan, 120 Ga. 173, 47 S. E. 557; Anthony v. State, 112 Ga. 751, 38 S. E. 79; Evans v. Bloodworth, 105 Ga. 835, 31 S. E. 778; Central Ry. Co. v. Whitehead, 105 Ga. 492, 30 S. E. 814, and cases cited. Writ of error…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lenney v. FinleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Wood v. County of TattnallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Anthony v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Evans v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clarke Bros. v. DealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Hollingsworth v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Hightower v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Wimpey v. Mayor of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Gossett v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API