Legal Opinion

New Jersey Department of the Public Advocate v. New Jersey Board of Public Utilities

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 2, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter involves a dispute between Rockland Electric Company (Rockland), a public utility, and the Office of the Public Advocate, Division of Rate Counsel (Rate Counsel), regarding an adjustment in Rockland’s Levelized Energy Adjustment Clause (LEAC). The Public Advocate appeals from a decision of the Board of Public Utilities (Board) which, among other things, approved Rockland’s request to reduce its LEAC by $9.8 million. Rate Counsel contends that the Board adopted a proposal based on matters outside of the record below in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), N.J.S.A.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corporation v. Fedders Corporation, Salvatore Giordano, Sr., Salvatore Giordano, Jr., Bruno Giordano, Ignatius MacBrinn and Howard S. ModlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Matter of Petition of Public Service Coordinated TransportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. NJ Bell Tel. Co. v. DEPT., BD. PUB. UTILITY COMM'RSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. In Re Petition of Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. In Re App. of Modern Indus. Waste ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Pse&g Co.'s Rate UnbundlingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. In re Atlantic City Electric Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. In re Public Service ElectricNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO N.J.A.C. 14:1-5.12, ETC. (NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API