Fried v. Bower & Gardner

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Since appellant’s belief in the justice of his underlying cause is obviously sincere, it is understandable that he finds the *767zealousness with which the respondents represented their client disturbing, and even offensive. But the appellant must also appreciate that an attorney at law, owing no fiduciary obligation to his adversary’s client, is free, if not obligated, so long as the steps he takes are within proper professional bounds, to carry out his responsibilities to his own client with full adversarial vigor. Examination of the record, as well as the…