Churchill v. Howe
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Emmet; Shepherd, J. Case by Charles L. Churchill against George Howe for conversion of funds belonging to plaintiff. An order was entered overruling a demurrer to plaintiff’s declaration. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
The subject-matter of the present contention was before this court on an appeal of a chancery suit entitled Churchill v. Howe, reported in 180 Mich. 150 (146 N. W. 623), wherein plaintiff sought to impress with a trust certain real estate, owned by defendant and his wife as tenants by entireties, on the ground that money borrowed by defendant from the Churchill & Webber Bank and invested in other land, which was exchanged for that upon which a lien was asserted, had been fraudulently invested and sequestered from reach of execution. In that suit a demurrer to complainant’s bill was sustained,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Baker v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Church v. Anti-Kalsomine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Churchill v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Andrews v. BlakesleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
3Cited by14 opinions
- Loweke v. Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Fultz v. Union-Commerce AssociatesMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- in Re Bradley EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Stimson v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Crews v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.