Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Narvanda S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 17, 2013Published

1Dissent

Mazzarelli, J.E, and Richter, J.,

dissent in a memorandum by Richter, J., as follows: Although the majority takes no issue with the sufficiency of the evidence, it nonetheless vacates the juvenile delinquency finding and remands with a direction to order an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD). There is no reason to interfere with the trial court’s disposition, and therefore I dissent.

On the day of the instant offense, the complainant, a 13-year-old girl, went into the main office of her school to wait until it *715was time to go to her next class. While she waited, appellant, who was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Donovan E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. In re Jonaivy Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re Florin R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re Zion F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. In re Jonnevin B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API