In re Narvanda S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Mazzarelli, J.E, and Richter, J.,
dissent in a memorandum by Richter, J., as follows: Although the majority takes no issue with the sufficiency of the evidence, it nonetheless vacates the juvenile delinquency finding and remands with a direction to order an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD). There is no reason to interfere with the trial court’s disposition, and therefore I dissent.
On the day of the instant offense, the complainant, a 13-year-old girl, went into the main office of her school to wait until it *715was time to go to her next class. While she waited, appellant, who was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Donovan E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Jonaivy Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re Florin R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Zion F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Jonnevin B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.