Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tucci

Schuylkill County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided July 22, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

Koch, P. J.,

— The reasons assigned in support of the motion are that the verdict is against the law and against the evidence, and that the court erred in its rulings on the admission of evidence and in its charge to *367the jury. We had been asked to direct a verdict, and our refusal to do that is also assigned as one of the reasons in support of the motion.

The Commonwealth offered an exemplified copy of the record of the County of Cecil, State of Maryland, showing an application for a marriage license to be issued to Nicola Tucci and Stella Tassone, and showing that they were married, certified…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yardley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  2. Commonwealth v. ColesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Durning v. HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Omohundro's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API