Legal Opinion

In re the Appeals of Various Applicants from a Decision of the Division of Property Valuation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 2013No. 105,785PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*440The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

This is a consolidated tax appeal disputing whether natural gas stored in facilities located in Kansas under contract with interstate companies is subject to ad valorem taxation. The Kansas Constitution, Article 11, § 1 (2012 Supp.) exempts merchants’ inventory from such taxation, but that exemption does not include tangible personal property owned by a public utility. The taxpayers claim they are entitled to the exemption. They are 40 business entities that fall into three general categories: out-of-state natural gas marketing companies,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Spencer Gifts, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. ETC Marketing, Ltd. v. Harris County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. ETC Marketing, Ltd. v. Harris County Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Davis v. SchnurrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. ETC Marketing, Ltd. v. Harris County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API