Legal Opinion
Schussheim v. Schussheim
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2013No. 2012-1235Published
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Schussheim v. Schussheim, 137 Ohio St.3d 133,
2013-Ohio-4529.] SCHUSSHEIM, APPELLEE, v. SCHUSSHEIM, APPELLANT. [Cite as Schussheim v. Schussheim, 137 Ohio St.3d 133,
2013-Ohio-4529.] Courts have the inherent authority to expunge and seal records when a case involves unusual and exceptional circumstances and when the interests of the party seeking expungement outweigh the legitimate need of the government to maintain the records. (No. 2012-1235—Submitted April 23, 2013—Decided October 16, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No. CA2011-07-078,
2012-Ohio-2573.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.