Legal Opinion
Junior F. Pandil v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1984No. 83-1349PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Junior F. Pandil petitions this Court for review of a decision of the United States Railroad Retirement Board (Board) denying him a disability annuity under section 2(a)(l)(v) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 U.S.C. § 231a(a)(l)(v). The issues on appeal are (1) whether Pandil’s petition for review was timely filed, and (2) whether the Board applied the correct legal principles in evaluating the adequacy of the evidence supporting the denial. We hold Pan-dil’s petition was timely filed under 45 U.S.C. § 231g. Because we find the hypothetical question submitted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wayne L. Tennant v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Duane N. Simonson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Alfred P. Gilliam v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary, Health, Education & Welfare of the United States or Successor or Successors in OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Virge Tucker, Jr. v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Savannah McGhee v. Patricia R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vincent D. Bowman v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Janet L. Bowers v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992