Legal Opinion

Mott v. Ransom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: "The granting or refusing of a continuance in a judicial proceeding is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and should not be interfered with absent a clear abuse thereof" (Matter of Bales, 93 AD2d 861, 862, lv dismissed 60 NY2d 554). There was no clear abuse of discretion in the denial of petitioner’s request for an adjournment of the hearing held February 9, 1993.

Family Court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s request for an adjournment of the hearing held May 4 and 5, 1993 (see, CPLR 4402; Matter of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heyer v. HeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In re the Estate of BalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. In re Justin D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mott v. RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API