Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Card

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 3, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, S.

Claimant seeks to establish a contract made with the deceased for work, labor and services.

Deceased was the grandfather of claimant’s husband, and the only witness testifying to the alleged contract is claimant’s husband. The courts do not look with favor on such evidence, and in the absence of additional evidence have rejected claims for insufficient proof. It so held in Matter of Otis (126 Misc. 741) and Hamlin v. Stevens (177 N. Y. 39).

However, it is the duty of the court in determining the validity of a claim of this nature to take into consideration all the facts and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Caldwell v. . LucasNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. In re the Estate of LongNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. In re the Estate of OtisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API