Legal Opinion

Butler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 20, 1989No. Nos. 88-1079, 88-1009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

As the parties agree, four of the five grounds asserted by the trial judge for the upward departure sentence imposed below are invalid. See Hester v. State, 520 So.2d 273 (Fla.1988); McGriff v. State, 528 So.2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 537 So.2d 107 (Fla.1989); Solomon v. State, 528 So.2d 1367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Under McGriff v. State, 537 So.2d 107 (Fla.1989), since the crime involved occurred prior to the enactment of section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1987), the cause is governed by the rule of Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985), that the trial court must now…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. McGriffSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. Hester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. McGriff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Lago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API