Tamaska v. City of Bluff City
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
The parties in these cases have filed cross-appeals of the district court’s various rulings regarding the awarding of and the amount of civil penalties and attorneys’ fees under the Clean Water Act. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
This action was originally brought, in part, as a citizens’ suit pursuant to Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, (“the Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 1365. In this suit, the Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Jean and Joe Tamaska, (“the Tamaskas”), alleged that the Appellee/Cross-Appellant, the City of Bluff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tennessee Clean Water Network v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Natural Resources Council of Maine v. International Paper Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Cooper v. Toledo Area Sanitary DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. TwedenDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Waste Connections of TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.