Legal Opinion

Nistler v. Footlocker Retail, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 21, 2008No. 99,329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

Mark Nistler appeals the Workers Compensation Board’s (Board) determination that he is not entitled to permanent partial disability benefits in excess of functional impairment. The issue presented on appeal is whether the Board erred in its determination that Nistler’s post-injury wages are equal to or more than 90% of his average gross weekly wage earned at the time of the accident. We reverse the Board’s decision and remand for a re-determination of Nistler’s wage loss and permanent partial general disability benefits.

The Underlying Circumstances

The basic facts supporting the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Denning v. KPERSSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Messner v. Continental Plastic ContainersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  2. Roberts v. MIDWEST MINERAL, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API