In the Interest of: SWM v. The State of Wyoming
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[T1] In this interlocutory appeal, Petitioner, SWM, challenges the juvenile court's determination that he was competent to proceed to adjudication in a delinquency proceeding. He contends that the juvenile court violated his constitutionally protected due process rights when it disregarded relevant evidence and failed to apply the proper standard in determining competency. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand for further proceedings.
ISSUE
[12] SWM presents one issue: Do the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Wyoming require that the due process…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alex Jordan Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- In re Interest of Victor L.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- In the Interest of Sp, Mr, Jr, and Mr, Minor Children: Idp v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
- In re D.C., Jr.Nevada Supreme Court · 2024