Legal Opinion

Betts v. Betts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 1974No. 342-189PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

This is an appeal from a denial by the circuit court of a motion by appellant-wife to increase the husband’s support obligation for the parties’ three children. The decree, entered in 1969, provided that the husband was to pay $100 per month per child until the children reached majority or were otherwise emancipated. The wife’s motion sought to increase the support payment to $125 per month per child.

The issue before us in this de novo review is whether the wife has established, by a preponderance of the evidence, a change in circumstances which would warrant an increase in child support.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rowley v. RowleyOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of DelfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Harder v. HarderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GrossiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Pelletier v. PelletierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API