Legal Opinion
Garlock v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.
Buffalo City Court
Decided January 15, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael L. McCarthy, J.
The plaintiff having moved for summary judgment, and the defendant having cross-moved for summary judgment, the facts are those uncontroverted assertions and exhibits found in the complaint, and the affidavits which were attached to the moving papers.
The plaintiff, on June 13, 1971, at about 7:30 p.m., entered a parking lot operated by (but not owned by) the defendant corporation. Plaintiff paid the attendant the parking fee (defendant said this was a nominal flat rate of 50 cents at that time) and was directed to park his 1968 Chevrolet Corvette…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Scurti v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Osborn v. ClineNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McGlynn v. Newark Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Gauthier v. Allright New Orleans, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Allen v. Hyatt Regency-Nashville HotelTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Allen v. Hyatt Regency-Nashville HotelTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Horowitz v. Ambassador Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.