Legal Opinion

Ritner v. Harris, Upham & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiff employed defendant stock brokerage firm to act as her agent in security transactions. Thereafter, defendant was served with a subpoena duces tecum in an action in the Supreme Court, Queens County, entitled Miriam Schulberg v. Norbert Schulberg, requiring defendant to appear in court and produce its records relating to plaintiff’s stock brokerage account. Instead of appearing before the court with the plaintiff’s brokerage records pursuant to the subpoena, defendant delivered to counsel for Norbert…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Opera on Tour, Inc. v. WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Stuart v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hamilton v. . Third Avenue Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoheb v. Pathology Associates of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Sagnia-Blythe v. GamblinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994
  3. Yochim v. Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'nYonkers City Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API