State v. Bain
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). This court has held that the doctrine of the common law, that, if the owner permits his stock to run at large and they enter upon the land of another, though uninclosed, he becomes a trespasser, is inapplicable to the condition and circumstances of our people, and has never been recognized in this State. L. R. & F. S. Ry. Co. v. Finley, 37 Ark. 562; and St. Louis I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Newman, 94 Ark. 458, 127 S. W. 735.
While this is true, it does not follow that the Legislature may not re-enact the common law, in whole or in part, or make that law the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- L. R. & F. S. Railway Co. v. FinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
- De Queen v. FentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Howell v. DaughetSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- State v. . MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Curlin v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Mitchell v. DeischSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929