Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
1DissentTraynor, J.
I dissent.
In my opinion the verdict is not supported by the evidence. The bus driver proceeding on a through highway had the right to assume that Mrs. Stickel would yield the right of way. (Veh. Code, § 552; Ambra v. Woolsey, 55 Cal.App.2d 104, 106 [130 P.2d 152]; Zwerin v. Riverside Cement Co., 52 Cal.App2d 715, 718-719 [126 P.2d 920]; Gritsch v. Pickwick Stages System, 131 Cal.App. 774, 780 [22 P.2d 554]; Inouye v. McCall, 35 Cal.App.2d 634, 638 [96 P.2d 386]; Silva v. Market Street Ry. Co., 50 Cal.App.2d 796, 800 [123 P.2d 904]; see Lindenbaum v. Barbour, 213 Cal. 277, 285-286 [2 P.2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- DeHaen v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co. of MassachusettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Donat v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Coakley v. AjuriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.