Fall v. Eastin
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court 1
215 U.S. 1 (1909)
FALL
v.
EASTIN.
No. 24.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted April 30, 1909.
Decided November 1, 1909.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA.
Mr. Charles J. Greene, Mr. Ralph W. Breckenridge and Thomas H. Matters, for plaintiff in error.
There was no appearance or brief for defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · McKENNAJustice McKENNA
The question in this case is whether a deed to land situate in Nebraska, made by a commissioner under the decree of a court of the State of Washington in an action for divorce, must be recognized in Nebraska under the due faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.