Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2005No. Docket 124928Published

1DissentKelly, J.

{dissenting). I would affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals. Defendants negotiated with plaintiff for extensions of the time in which to file their answer. They failed to obtain approval of any extension from the trial court. Moreover, they failed to file their affidavit of meritorious defense in conformance with the mandatory requirements for medical malpractice actions.

I would hold that a party who requests a late answer and expresses no objection to the pleadings cannot challenge an early complaint. Defendants implicitly waived their statute of limitations defense predicated on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API