Legal Opinion

Kealoha v. Tanaka

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1962No. 4075Published

1Opinion of the Court

370 P.2d 468 (1962)

Mabel Chang KEALOHA and Jacquelyn Arruda, a Minor, by her Substituted Next Friend and Guardian ad litem, Donald Arruda

v.

Raymond M. TANAKA.

No. 4075.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

March 29, 1962.

Kenneth E. Young, Honolulu, for appellants.

Ralph T. Yamaguchi, Frank D. Padgett, Robertson, Castle & Anthony, Honolulu, for respondent.

Before CASSIDY, WIRTZ, LEWIS, and MIZUHA, JJ., and TASHIRO, Circuit Judge, in place of TSUKIYAMA, C. J., disqualified.

MIZUHA, Justice.

This is an action in negligence instituted by plaintiffs-appellants against defendant-appellee for damages resulting from the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Glover v. FongHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ciacci v. WoolleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Jones v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API