Legal Opinion

Lindley v. Delman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1933No. 20977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In the trial court Mrs. Francis Delman, as plaintiff, instituted this action against Miss Florence Lindley, as defendant, for damages for libel growing out of the circulation of a typewritten instrument purporting to be an anonymous letter. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Delman, was employed at Sapulpa as deputy county clerk of Creek county, and the defendant, Miss Lindley, resided in Sapulpa.

The document or instrument upon which this action was predicated is typewritten throughout, and is in words and figures…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fite v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Hargrove v. Oklahoma Press Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. KendallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Wiley v. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Spencer v. MinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Rickbeil v. Grafton Deaconess HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Tulsa Tribune Co. v. KightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Tulsa County Fairgrounds Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API