Mann v. Martin, Adm'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 51 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COMMON PLEAS COURT. 1. In the proceeding to empower Mrs. Mann to contract, etc., as a feme sole, the publication of the notice required by the statute (Myers’s Supp. 728), was sufficient, although the order designating the newspaper was not made until the judgment was rendered, and therefore the proceedings were not void although they may have been irregular and erroneous. 2. Section 218 of Myers’s Code does not apply to a…
Read the full summary
Case 51 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COMMON PLEAS COURT. 1. In the proceeding to empower Mrs. Mann to contract, etc., as a feme sole, the publication of the notice required by the statute (Myers’s Supp. 728), was sufficient, although the order designating the newspaper was not made until the judgment was rendered, and therefore the proceedings were not void although they may have been irregular and erroneous. 2. Section 218 of Myers’s Code does not apply to a case like this, where the sheriff levied upon goods not in the possession of the execution defendant, but in the…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HINES
deliveeed the opinion of the court.
Appellant, a married woman, claiming tbe right by virtue of a decree of the Louisville Chancery Court, rendered February 10, 1871, to trade as a feme sole, brought this action against appellees on the official bond of the sheriff to recover damages for the seizure of certain personal property. The property was taken under an order of delivery issued in the *765action of Lane &. Bartlett v. W. B. Mann, husband of appellant, and designated as belonging to the defendant in that action. Before the execution of the order by the sheriff, appellant caused to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Sypert v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Mann v. Martin's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884