Schweyer ex rel. Kline v. Walbert
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 58, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Berks Co., March Term, 1896, No. 258, making absolute a rule to open judgment. Rule to open judgment. Endlich, J., filed the following opinion. The application in tliis case is to open a judgment entered. upon bond and warrant of attorney and to stay an execution issued thereon.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 58, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Berks Co., March Term, 1896, No. 258, making absolute a rule to open judgment. Rule to open judgment. Endlich, J., filed the following opinion. The application in tliis case is to open a judgment entered. upon bond and warrant of attorney and to stay an execution issued thereon. The allegation upon which it is founded is that the bond and warrant accompanied a mortgage given by defendants upon, and for a balance of tlie purchase money of, certain realty (thirty-four acres) purchased by Sarah Walbert from the use plaintiffs’…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Our examination of the evidence in support of the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense has satisfied us that it was clearly sufficient to justify the decree making the rule absolute, etc. *341The case was fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the court below that further comment is unnecessary.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Allinger v. MelvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McCormack v. JermynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Humbert v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Henderson v. SonnebornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Wheatley v. NiedichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.