Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Redi-Floors, Inc. v. Sonenberg Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 2002No. A01A1841Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Judge

I concur with Division 1 of the majority opinion that the court clearly erred in directing a verdict in favor of the Sonenberg Company. I dissent, however, as to Division 2, because I believe that Redi-Floor’s decision to obtain a judgment against Manor Associates Limited Partnership has rendered the error harmless. Redi-Floors had the right, as do all plaintiffs, to pursue mutually exclusive remedies prior to the verdict; but once Redi-Floors procured a judgment order which was reduced to writing against Manor Associates, that constituted an election of alternative remedies that precluded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watson v. Sierra Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Wylly v. S. Z. Collins & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  3. Brown-Wright Hotel Supply Corp. v. BagenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Crolley v. Haygood Contracting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Kingsberry Homes v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API