Legal Opinion

Ku Klux Klan v. Martin Luther King Worshippers

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided April 19, 1990No. 1-90-0002, 1-90-0003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge,

Before the Court in docket no. 1-90-0002 is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought by the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan against a group known as the Giles Countians United (which the Ku Klux Klan has referred to as the “Martin Luther King Jr. Worshippers”) and the following individuals: Bettie Higgins, the executive director of the Giles County Chamber of Commerce and board member of the Giles Countians United; James Abernathy, the Superintendent of Schools for Giles County, Tennessee; Hal Stewart, the Mayor of Pulaski, Tennessee; and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Harvard v. GautAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Church of American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition, Inc. v. Town of AshlandMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API