Legal Opinion

Christian Benevolent Ass'n of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1994No. Nos. 93-689 and 93-696PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The Tax Commissioner may not exempt property from taxation unless the exempt use began by the tax lien date of the year for which exemption is sought. R.C. 5713.08(B); Ursuline Academy of Cleveland v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1943), 141 Ohio St. 563, 567, 26 O.O. 152, 154, 49 N.E.2d 674, 676.

CBA and Brentwood contest the BTA’s interpretation of the exemption of property found in R.C. 5709.12 and 5701.13. R.C. 5709.12(B) provides:

“ * * * All property owned and used by a nonprofit organization exclusively for a home for the aged, as defined in section 5701.13 of the Revised Code, also shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ursuline Academy v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Toledo Business & Professional Women's Retirement Living, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. SupanickOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship Fund v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Episcopal School v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sylvania Church of God v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. West Side Deutscher Frauen Verein v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Society of Holy Child Jesus v. Summit CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2007
  5. NBC-USA Hous., Inc. — Five v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API