Legal Opinion
In Re DM
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 2001No. 98-FS-1546, 98-FS-1547Published
1Opinion of the Court
771 A.2d 360 (2001)
In re D.M., Don. M., Appellant.
Nos. 98-FS-1546, 98-FS-1547.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued February 27, 2001.
Decided April 12, 2001.
Donald M. Temple, Washington, DC, for appellant.
Sheila Kaplan, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Robert R. Rigsby, Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for the District of Columbia.
Deborah D. Boddie, Washington, DC, filed a memorandum in lieu of brief for D.M.
Before STEADMAN, SCHWELB, and, RUIZ, Associate Judges.
Schwelb, Associate Judge:
Childhood is precious, and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- District of Columbia v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.