Commonwealth v. Headley
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 90 — Indictment for Bribery APPEAL FROM m’CRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT. Indictment Dismissed on Demurrer and the Commonwealth Appeals.
Read the full summary
Case 90 — Indictment for Bribery APPEAL FROM m’CRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT. Indictment Dismissed on Demurrer and the Commonwealth Appeals. The indictment in this case is as follows: The grand jurors of the county of McCracken in the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse E. M. Headley of the offense of bribery, committed in manner and form as follows, to-wit: The said E. M. Headley in the said county of Mc-Cracken, on the 14th day of December, 1900, and within two years before the finding of the indictment, did unlawfully bribe W. E. Baker by paying him the sum of one…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the court by
JUDGE GUFFY
Reversing.
• The grand jury of McCracken county returned án indictment against E. M. Headley, charging him with the offense of bribery. The indictment reads as follows: ■“The grand jurors of the county of McCracken, in the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, ■accuse E. M. Headley of the offense of bribery, committed ■in manner and form as follows, to wit: The said E. M. Headley, in the said county of McCracken, on the 14th day of December, 1900, and within two years before the ■finding of this indictment, did unlawfully bribe W. E.…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911