People v. Hingerton
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.
This motion, brought by defendant, is designed to have certain contraband suppressed, the contraband having been found in defendant’s premises by parole officers after they had arrested defendant for violating his parole, and also to have his oral statement suppressed concerning the contra*1064band in question, which was allegedly made to them by defendant after his arrest. Both issues are made the targets of invalidity on the contention of their being violative of the Fourth and the Fifth Amendments, respectively.
These alleged illegal blights had occurred in. conjunction with the arrest of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People Ex Rel. Dote v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- People Ex Rel. Newton v. . TwomblyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- People v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. SantosNew York Supreme Court · 1975